IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD ?- CHAPTER 4- FIFTY THOUSAND ERRORS (?) IN THE BIBLE

IS THE BIBLE GODS

WORD?By Ahmed Deedat

CHAPTER FOUR

FIFTY THOUSAND ERRORS (?)

The Jehovah’s Witnesses in their “AWAKE!” Magazine dated 8 September, 1957, carried this startling headline — “50000 ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?” (See below for the reproduction).

While I was still formulating the theme of this booklet, I heard a knock at my door one Sunday morning. I opened the door. A European gentleman stood there, grinning broadly. “Good morning'” he said. “Good morning” I replied. He was offering me his “Awake” and “Watchtower” magazines. Yes, a Jehovah’s Witness! If a few had knocked at your door previously, you will recognize them immediately. The most supercilious lot of people who ever knocked at people’s doors! I invited him in.

As soon as he settled down, I produced the full reproduction of what you see below. Pointing to the monograph

at the top of the page, I asked, “Is this your’s?” He readily recognised his own. I said, “It says: 50 000 Errors in the Bible, is it true?” “What’s that!” he exclaimed. I repeated, “I said, that it says, that there are 50 000 errors in your Bible.” “Where did you get that?” He asked. (This was published 23 years ago, when he was perhaps a little nipper) I said, “Leave the fancy talk aside — is this your’s?” pointing again to the monograph — “Awake!” He said, “Can I have a look?” “Of course,” I said. I handed him the page. He started perusing. They (the Jehovah’s Witnesses) are trained. They attend classes five times a week in their “Kingdom Halls.” Naturally, they are the fittest missionaries among the thousand -and – one – sects – and – denominations of Christendom. They are taught that when cornered, do not commit yourself to anything, do not open your mouths. Wait for the Holy Ghost to inspire you with what to say.

* To read the complete article, click here

I silently kept watching him, while he browsed the page. Suddenly he looked up. He had found it. The “Holy Ghost” had tickled him. He began, “The article says that “most of those errors have been eliminated.” I asked “If MOST are eliminated, how many remain out of 50000? 5000? 500? 50? Even if 50 remain, do you attribute those errors to God?” He was speechless. He excused himself by suggesting that he will come again with some senior member of his Church. That will be the day!

If I had this booklet ready, I would have offered him, saying — “I would like to do you a favour, give me your name and address, and your telephone number. I will lend you this booklet — IS THE BIBLE GOD’S WORD?” for 90 days. I want a written reply!” If you do this, And a few other Muslims do the same. They and the other missionaries will never darken your doors again. I believe that this publication will prove the most effective talisman to date. Insha-Allah!

This “cult” of Jehovah’s Witnesses which is so strong in its condemnation of the orthodox Trinitarians, for playing with the “Word of God,” is itself playing the same game of semantic gymnastics. In the article under review — “50000 ERRORS IN THE BIBLE?” — they say: “there are probably 50 000 errors . . . errors that have crept into the Bible text . . . 50000 such serious (?) errors… most of those so-called errorsas a whole the Bible is accurate.” (?)

We do not have the time and space to go into the tens of thousands of — grave or minor — defects that the authors of the Revised Standard Version (RSV) have attempted to revise. We leave that privilege to the Christian scholars of the Bible. Here I will endeavour to cast just a cursory glance at a “half-a-dozen” or so of those “minor” changes.

1. “Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a VIRGIN shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.”

(Isaiah 7:14 – AV)

The indispensable “VIRGIN” in the above verse has now been replaced in the RSV with the phrase “a young woman,” which is the correct translation of the Hebrew word almah. Almah is the word which has occurred all along in the Hebrew text and NOT bethulah which means VIRGIN. This correction is only to be found in the English language translation, as the RSV is only published in this tongue. For the African and the Afrikaner, the Arab and the Zulu, in fact, in the 1 500 other languages of the world, Christians are made to continue to swallow the misnomer “VIRGIN.”

BEGOTTEN, NOT MADE

“Jesus is the only begotten son of God, begotten not made,” is an adjunct of the orthodox catechism, leaning for support on the following:

2. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only BEGOTTEN son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”

(John 3:16 – AV)

No priest worth his cloth would fail to quote “the only BEGOTTEN of the Father!” when preaching to a prospective convert. But this fabrication — “BEGOTTEN” — has now been unceremoniously excised by the Bible Revisers, without a word of excuse. They are as silent as church-mice and would not draw the reader’s attention to their furtive excision. This blasphemous word “BEGOTTEN” was another of the many such interpolations in the “Holy Bible.” God Almighty condemned this blasphemy in the strongest terms soon after its innovation. He did not wait for 2000 years for Bible scholars to reveal the fraud.

The Muslim World should congratulate the “Fifty cooperating denominations” of Christendom and their Brains Trust the “Thirty-two scholars of the highest eminence” for bringing their Holy Bible a degree nearer to the Qur-anic truth.

“CHRISTIAN MES-A-MATHICS”

3. “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the FATHER,
the WORD, and the HOLY GHOST: and these three are one.”

1st Epistle of John 5:7 – AV

This verse is the closest approximation to what the Christians call their Holy Trinity in the encyclopaedia called the BIBLE. This key-stone of the Christian faith has also been scrapped from the RSV without even a semblance of explanation. It has been a pious fraud all along and well-deservedly has it been expunged in the RSV for the English-speaking people. But for the 1499 remaining language groups of the world who read the Christian concoctions in their mother tongues, the fraud remains. These people will never know the truth until the Day of Judgement. However, we Muslims must again congratulate the galaxy of D.D.’s who have been honest enough to eliminate another lie from the English (RSV) Bible, thus bringing their Holy Book yet another step closer to the teachings of Islam. For the Holy Qur’an says:

* Not one in a trinity. Not one in a trinity.

THE ASCENSION

One of the most serious of those “grave defects” which the authors of the RSV had tried to rectify concerned the Ascension of Christ. There have been only two references in the Canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and of John to the most stupendous event in Christianity — OF JESUS BEING TAKEN UP INTO HEAVEN. These two references were obtained in every Bible in every language, prior to 1952, when the RSV first appeared. These were:

4a. “So then the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken to them, was TAKEN UP INTO HEAVEN, and sat down at the right hand of God.”

(Mark 16:19)

4b. “While he blessed them, he parted from them, and was CARRIED UP INTO HEAVEN.”

(Luke 24:51)

Now please look at the image below, which is a photo copy where the quotation 4a above ought to appear. You will be shocked to note that Mark 16 ends at verse 8, and after an embarrassing expanse of blank space the missing verses appear in “small print” as a footnote at the bottom of the page. If you can lay your hands on a RSV 1952, you will find the last six words of 4b above, i.e. “AND WAS CARRIED UP INTO HEAVEN” replaced by a tiny “a” to tell you to see the footnote if you please, where you will find these missing words. Every honest Christian has to admit that he does not consider any footnote in any Bible as the word of God. Why should the paid servants of Christianity consign the mightiest miracle of their religion to a mere footnote?

From the Chart — “The Origin and Growth of the English Bible” — appearing below, you will note that all the Biblical “Versions” prior to the Revised Version of 1881 were dependent upon the ANCIENT COPIES — those dating only five or six hundred years after Jesus. The Revisers of the RSV 1952, were the first Bible scholars who were able to tap the “MOST Ancient Copies” fully, dating three and four centuries after Christ. We agree that the closer to the source the more authentic is the document. Naturally “MOST” Ancient deserves credence more than mere “ANCIENT.” But not finding a word about Jesus being “taken up” or “carried up” into heaven in the MOST ANCIENT manuscripts, the Christian fathers expurgated those references from the RSV 1952.

THE DONKEY CIRCUS

The above facts are a staggering confession by Christendom that the “inspired” authors of the Canonical Gospels did not record a single word about the ASCENSION of Jesus- Yet these “inspired” authors were unanimous in recording that their Lord and Saviour rode a donkey into Jerusalem as his mission drew to a close.

“. . . and they sat him thereon.” (The Donkey) (Matt. 21:7) “. . . and he sat upon him.” (The Donkey)(Mark 11:7)
“. . . and they set Jesus Thereon.” (The Donkey)(Luke 19:35) “. . . Jesus … sat thereon:” (The Donkey) (John 12:14)

Could God Almighty have been the author of this incongruous situation — going out of His Way to see that all the Gospel writers did not miss their footing recording of His “son’s” donkey-ride into the Holy City — and yet “inspiring” them to black-out the news about His “son’s” heavenly flight on the wings of angels?

NOT FOR LONG!

The hot-gospellers and the Bible-thumpers were too slow in catching the Joke. By the time they realised that the corner-stone of their preaching — THE ASCENSION OF JESUS — had been undermined as a result of Christian Biblical erudition, the publishers of the RSV had already raked in a net profit of 15 000 000 dollars! (Fifteen Million). The propagandists made a big hue and cry, and with the backing of two denominational committees out of the fifty, forced the Publishers to re-incorporate the interpolations into the “INSPIRED” Word of God in every new publication of the RSV after 1952, the expunged portion was “RESTORED TO THE TEXT.”

It is an old, old game. The Jews and the Christians have been editing their “Book of God” from its very inception. The difference between them and the ancient forgerers is that the ancient forgers did not know the art of writing “prefaces” and “footnotes”, otherwise they too would have told us as clearly as our modern heroes have about their tampering, and their glib excuses for transmuting forged currency into glittering gold.

“MANY PROPOSALS FOR MODIFICATION WERE SUBMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE BY INDIVIDUALS AND BY TWO DENOMINATIONAL COMMITTEES ALL OF THESE WERE GIVEN CAREFUL ATTENTION BY THE COMMITTEE.

“TWO PASSAGES, THE I LONGER ENDING OF MARK (16:9-20) . . . AND LUKE 24:51 ARE RESTORED TO THE TEXT.”
(Preface — Collins’ pages vi and vii)

“Why ‘restored'”? Because they had been previously expunged! Why had the references to the Ascension expunged in the first place? The MOST Ancient manuscripts had no references to the Ascension at all. They were interpolations similar to 1 John 5:7 about the Trinity. (Refer to the earlier example 3). Why eliminate one and re-instate the other? Do not be surprised! By the time you lay your hands on a RSV, the “Committee” might also have decided to expunge the whole of their invaluable Preface. The Jehovah’s Witnesses have already eliminated 27 revealing pages of their FOREWORD to their “New World Translation of the CHRISTIAN GREEK SCRIPTURES,” (this is their way of saying — New Testament).

ALLAH IN THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE

The Rev. C. I. Scofield, D. D. with a team of 8 Consulting Editors, also all D.D.’s in the “Scofield Reference Bible” thought it appropriate to spell the Hebrew word “Elah” (meaning God) alternatively as “Alah” The Christians had thus swallowed the camel — they seemed to have accepted at last that the name of God is Allah — but were still straining at the gnat by spelling Allah with one “L”! (Photographic reproduction of the Bible page showing the word “ALAH” is preserved here for posterity below). References were made in public lectures to this fact by the author of this booklet. Believe me, the subsequent “Scofield Reference Bible” has retained word for word the whole commentary of Genesis 1:1, but has, by a clever sleight-of-hand, blotted out the word “Alah” altogether. There is not even a gap where the word “Alah” once used to be. 1 This is in the Bible of the orthodox! One is hard pressed to keep up with their Jugglery.

1. See “WHAT IS HIS NAME” for more information on this Biblical omission of the word Allah. Under the section of “Now you see it, now you don’t”.

Visitor Map
Create your own visitor map!

5 Comments

  1. Posted February 6, 2008 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    good blog

  2. adek
    Posted February 8, 2008 at 2:13 am | Permalink

    First of all, I’d like to thank for giving me a chance to post a comment.

    Second of all, I have in my hand right now a (i) New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures (2nd editon, 1961) which was rendered from the original languages by the New World Bible Translation Committee and published by Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York Inc. (International Bible Students Association Brooklyn, New York, USA) and (ii) The Holy Qur’an (2000 edition) which was translated by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and published by Wordsworth Editions Limited, Ware, Hertfordshire, UK.

    The followings are my commentaries to what Mr. Ahmad Deedat wrote about the Bible:

    1. Isaiah 7:14 says: “Therefore Jehovah himself will give YOU men a sign: Look! The maiden herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving a birth to a on, and she will certainly call his name Im-man’u-el.”
    The word “maiden” has the same meaning with the word “virgin” or “bethulah” and with the word “young girl” or “almah”. How come a maiden is not virgin or a young girl? Unless she’d have been married to a man or was a divorcee, then she’d not be called “virgin” or “young girl” anymore but a woman or an adult. And Mary was certainly a “virgin” or “young girl” until she’d got married to Jusuf and became pregnant not by having sexual intercourse with his husband but by the power of the Most High which had overshadowed her.

    2. John 3:16 says: “For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that every one exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.”.
    The words “only-begotten Son” are not Jesus’s self proclaimation. God himself proclaimed it. Matthew 3:17 says: “Look! Also, there was a voice from heavens that said: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved.”. So, did God beget Jesus? No, Mary did. Or is God begotten? No, Jesus is. And how did Mary beget Jesus or how is Jesus begotten? Al-Anbiya’:91 says: “And (remember) her who guarded her chastity: We breathed into her of Our Spirit, and We made her and her son a Sign for all peoples.”. But even if God wants to have a son, no human being nor even a Moslem can say it can’t be happening! Why? Because God is the Creator of all. He can do whatever he wants. Az-Zumar:4 says: Had Allah wished to take to Himself a son, He could have chosen whom He pleased out of those whom He doth create: but Glory to Him! (He is above such things.) He is Allah, the One, the Irrestible.”.

    3.First of John 5:7 says: “For there are three witness bearers, the spirit and the water and the blood, and the three are in agreement.”
    There is no word “trinity” in this phrase and even in the entire Bible. Trinity is the dogma/doctrine of Christianity which consists of God, the Creator, who sent down his beloved Son, Jesus the Christ, who gave the Holy Spirit. What Qur’an means about “trinity” is very much different with what the dogma/doctrine of Christianity says about it. Al-Ma’idah:73 says: “They do blaspheme who say: “Allah is one of three in a Trinity…”. The question is who would be the two of three according to Qur’an? Al-Ma’idah:115 says: “And behold, Allah will say: ‘O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, “Worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah”?’…”. If Qur’an is the word of God, how could it be mistaken?

    4. Mark 16:19 says: “So, then, the Lord Jesus, after having spoken to them, was taken up to heaven and sat down at the right hand of God.” and Luke 24:51 says: “As he was blessing them he was parted from them and began to be borne up to heaven.”
    Why is Mr. Deedat bothering himself with such footnote? Bible is the word of God but was written by men. Gospel means good news about Jesus the Christ. Mark is not one of the 12 disciples. So he wrote Gospel according to what he read, found, heard and the most important to what he believed. Mr. Deedat concluded: “There have been only two references in the Canonical Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and of John to the most stupendous event in Christianity — OF JESUS BEING TAKEN UP INTO HEAVEN.”. Did he read John 20:17 [that] says: “Jesus said to her: “Stop clinging to me. For I have not yet ascended to the Father. But be on your way to my brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to my Father and YOUR Father and to my God and YOUR God.'”. And beside what is wrong if Matthew and John did not write specifically about the ascendant of Christ? If Mark and Luke did, that’s enough. The witness of two men is true [see Deuteronomy 19:15]. Just to make you sure that Jesus had ascended, Acts 1:9 stresses out: “And after he had said these things, while they were looking on, he was lifted up and a cloud caught him up from their vision.”.

    5. Matthew 21:7 says: “And they brought the ass and its colt, and they put upon these their outer garments, and he seated himself upon them.”, Mark 11:7 says: “And they brought the colt to Jesus, and they put their outer garments upon it, and he sat on it.”, Luke 19:35 says: “And they led it to Jesus, and they threw their outer garments upon the colt and set Jesus upon [it].” and John 12:14 says: “But when Jesus had found a young ass, he sat on it…”.
    Why is Mr. Deedat bothering himself with the ass/donkey? Each Gospel was written by its author. So, it’s not important how he got himself on the colt. But what is important about it is the fulfillment of a Messianic prophecy. Zachariah 9:9 says: “Be very joyful, O daughter of Zion. Shout in triumph, O daughter of Jerusalem. Look! Your King himself comes to you. He is righteous, yes, saved; humble, and riding upon an ass, even upon a full-grown animal the son of a she-ass.”.

    The image above of a photographic reproduction of the Bible page that showing the word “ALAH” is a commentary of Genesis 1:1 by the Rev. C. I. Scofield, D. D. and a team of 8 Consulting Editors. Since they were not Jews and certainly don’t speak Hebrew, they were trying to study Bible by comparing the English language used in the Bible with the original language in order for them to able to interprete the Bible verbally.

    That’s all. Hope the above simply clear the issues Mr. Deedat brought up.

  3. Posted February 10, 2008 at 4:20 am | Permalink

    adek Said

    1. Isaiah 7:14 says: “Therefore Jehovah himself will give YOU men a sign: Look! The maiden herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving a birth to a on, and she will certainly call his name Im-man’u-el.”
    The word “maiden” has the same meaning with the word “virgin” or “bethulah” and with the word “young girl” or “almah”. How come a maiden is not virgin or a young girl? Unless she’d have been married to a man or was a divorcee, then she’d not be called “virgin” or “young girl” anymore but a woman or an adult. And Mary was certainly a “virgin” or “young girl” until she’d got married to Jusuf and became pregnant not by having sexual intercourse with his husband but by the power of the Most High which had overshadowed her.

    2. John 3:16 says: “For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that every one exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.”.
    The words “only-begotten Son” are not Jesus’s self proclaimation. God himself proclaimed it. Matthew 3:17 says: “Look! Also, there was a voice from heavens that said: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved.”. So, did God beget Jesus? No, Mary did. Or is God begotten? No, Jesus is. And how did Mary beget Jesus or how is Jesus begotten?

    MY REPLY :

    Adek first of all I am thankful for your participation in the true religion debate and expressing your oppinions

    Secondly I just want to ask you what you mean by saying

    And Mary was certainly a “virgin” or “young girl” until she’d got married to Jusuf and became pregnant not by having sexual intercourse with his husband but by the power of the Most High which had overshadowed her.

    What does that mean ? when you say The most High God overshadowed her and beget a child ? how would it sound if you narrate such shameless things defiling the pure Lord to your Kids or Teens ? honestly would you feel comfortable by narrating your own Bible to your children , teens ?

    OR

    You would rather feel comfortable narrating to your child the Quran and what it says about the Virgin Mary (p) conception of Jesus (p) ? just read the Quran and decide for your self

    The Nobel Quran Surah 19. Mary ( 16-22)

    16. Relate in the Book (the story of) Mary, when she withdrew from her family to a place in the East.

    17. She placed a screen (to screen herself) from them; then We sent her our angel, and he appeared before her as a man in all respects.

    18. She said: “I seek refuge from thee to ((Allah)) Most Gracious: (come not near) if thou dost fear Allah.”

    19. He said: “Nay, I am only a messenger from thy Lord, (to announce) to thee the gift of a holy son.

    20. She said: “How shall I have a son, seeing that no man has touched me, and I am not unchaste?”

    21. He said: “So (it will be): Thy Lord saith, ‘that is easy for Me: and (We wish) to appoint him as a Sign unto men and a Mercy from Us’:It is a matter (so) decreed.”

    22. So she conceived him, and she retired with him to a remote place.

    Be honset and tell me would you not feel more comfortable teaching the Quran to your Kids and Teens rather than Bible ?

    Secondly when you say

    2. John 3:16 says: “For God loved the world so much that he gave his only-begotten Son, in order that every one exercising faith in him might not be destroyed but have everlasting life.”.
    The words “only-begotten Son” are not Jesus’s self proclaimation. God himself proclaimed it. Matthew 3:17 says: “Look! Also, there was a voice from heavens that said: “This is my Son, the beloved, whom I have approved.”. So, did God beget Jesus? No, Mary did. Or is God begotten? No, Jesus is. And how did Mary beget Jesus or how is Jesus begotten?

    Adek let me first give you the definition of the word BEGOTTEN , then tell me honestly are you fair in saying that it was Mary ONLY (p) who beget Jesus (p) and not God the Holy father of Jesus (p) ? according to Bible ? I wish the Bible said but unfortunately it does not .

    begotten – (of offspring) generated by procreation; “naturally begotten child”

    lawfully-begotten – born in wedlock; enjoying full filial rights

    begotten -to procreate as the father -sire

    Now tell me honestly do you still say that Jesus was Begotten Son of Mary but NOT BEGOTTEN SON OF GOD, BUT ONLY THE SON OF GOD ? by the way is not Jesus God according to Christians ? so your logic seems to be actually saying God was begotten through Mary ? but God did not beget God(Jesus) ?

    OR

    Do you as a God fearing man rather stop abusing and insulting God by Taking out the degretory word BEGOTTEN once and for all from the fair name of God , and say what the Quran says about the attribute of Pure Lord ?

    The Nobel Quran Surah 112. The Unity, Sincerity, Oneness Of Allah

    1. Say: He is Allah, the One and Only;

    2. Allah, the Eternal, Absolute;

    3. He begetteth not, nor is He begotten;

    4. And there is none like unto Him.

  4. Posted February 16, 2008 at 3:49 am | Permalink

    The only error I see is in your understanding, for there are no errors in the bible,(KJV)…

    Allah was and is a pagan god, there is only one true God and His name is Jesus Christ…Even in your quran it says that Jesus is the Messiah, and yet in another verse it says that Jesus was nothing more than a prophet, muhammad was in error when he wrote and did not know who Jesus was…

    Face it, your god cannot save you, your god cannot wash your sins away, your god cannot forgive you because your god is dead…

    Johnnie

  5. Posted February 16, 2008 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    Johnnie said this joke

    The only error I see is in your understanding, for there are no errors in the bible,(KJV)…

    Allah was and is a pagan god, there is only one true God and His name is Jesus Christ…Even in your quran it says that Jesus is the Messiah, and yet in another verse it says that Jesus was nothing more than a prophet, muhammad was in error when he wrote and did not know who Jesus was…

    Face it, your god cannot save you, your god cannot wash your sins away, your god cannot forgive you because your god is dead…

    Johnnie

    MY REPLY :

    Johnnie , GROW UP , I GUESS YOU ARE A MAN NOT A KID TO TALK SUCH BABBLINGS OF A I YEAR OLD KID

    WHO HAS TOLD THEY ARE THOUSANDS OF ERRORS IN BIBLE , CHRISTIAN SCHOLARS OR MUSLIM SCHOLARS ?

    WHY DONT YOU TAKE OUT YOUR FRUSTRATION ON YOUR OWN CHRISTIAN SCHOLARS WHO SAID THE BIBLE IS FILLED WITH SERIOUS ERRORS AND MISTAKES , INSTEAD OF CURSING ME OR MUSLIMS ?

    IT WOULD BE MATURE ACT ON YOUR PART NOT TO CONSIDER SUCH BOOK AS THE WORD OF GOD 100% – PEACE

    WHO’S GOD DIED ON THE CROSS YOUR OR MINE ?

    WHO IS A PAGAN WORSHIPING IDOLS OF JESUS , YOU OR ME ?

    WHO’S GOD IS GREATER YOURS AND MINE ?

    FOR YOUR GOD WANTED THE INNOCENT BLOOD OF HIS SON TO FORGIVE YOU, BUT MY GOD DOES NOT REQUIRE SUCH IN HUMAN PLEASING TO FORGIVE ME , FOR HE FORGIVES ALL THE SINS

    ALLAH FORGIVES ALL SINS

    “Say: O my Servants who have transgressed against their souls.
    Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: for Allah forgives all sins: for He is
    Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” Holy Quran 39:53

    NO SIR MY GOD NEVER DIED , BUT YOUR GOD DIED ON THE CROSS , KILLED BY A BUNCH OF HUMANS , FACE IT YOUR GOD COULD NOT EVEN SAVE HIMSELF FROM BEING KILLED , THEN HOW HE IS GOING TO SAVE YOU AND ME ?

    Matthew 27:46 tells us that about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, “Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani?” which means, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?

    PEACE

    P.S

    I KNOW GOD CAN NEVER DIE , I ALSO KNOW YOUR GOD NEVER DIED BUT YOU CHRISTIANS HAVE LIED .

    THANK YOU


2 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. […] bookmarks tagged furtive IS THE BIBLE GODS WORD ?- CHAPTER 4- FIFTY THOUSAN… saved by 5 others     Ruyana bookmarked on 02/07/08 | […]

  2. […] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptFrom the Chart — “The Origin and Growth of the English Bible” — appearing below, you will note that all the Biblical “Versions” prior to the Revised Version of 1881 were dependent upon the ANCIENT COPIES — those dating only five or six … […]

Post a Comment

Required fields are marked *
*
*

%d bloggers like this: